other pictures on flickr. :) Hello
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Back Shoulder Blade- Clip Art
futility
I'm really tired and I have glasses so you'll find twice as many spelling errors. but who cares.
I just returned from Par Tot parade, a parade with hundreds of kids dressed as a mime, dancer, who has led each can and improvised percussive tribal-Brazilian music by Zaragoza to Villa Serena. I have not continued to the end, I did not, too tired to dance or move, I took pictures and publish it when I find the fucking cable nikon.
Apart from back pain and the foot was a really nice afternoon.
I needed after so much bad news. 
I'm really tired and I have glasses so you'll find twice as many spelling errors. but who cares.
I just returned from Par Tot parade, a parade with hundreds of kids dressed as a mime, dancer, who has led each can and improvised percussive tribal-Brazilian music by Zaragoza to Villa Serena. I have not continued to the end, I did not, too tired to dance or move, I took pictures and publish it when I find the fucking cable nikon.
Apart from back pain and the foot was a really nice afternoon.
I needed after so much bad news.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Cheats For Pokemon Ruby On Vba
clouds in london these days are imported directly from London, as well as the rain that keeps our clothes wet. The climate is swinging like my mood swings. Sugar is sinking under the heavy surface of milk in my cappuccino. It 'strange that I drink with the spoon in the cup ever since I was little and it always triggers some shared laughter. I'm listening Ryoji Ikeda with duplex as I write. The bartender shakes
sweating behind the counter, three boys ask for a coffee in a cocktail shaker and a milkshake. The bartender is shaken not look into the eyes and nobody seems to speak for itself when it tries to summarize the orders: "So let's see" tries to summarize all his forces to concentrate But some corroborating the substance is preventing neuronal stress.
order rests in a cup "for a regular coffee," one more 'great' this for the hood "with unimaginable speed neurotic rests the glass of glass that breaks in his hand. The drops of blood a motif on the white counter. He spits some pig god voice.
I would go to a concert of Radiohead but the idea of \u200b\u200bhaving to organize it is too heavy, I do not know what to decide but as always will be one of those decisions made at the last minute. It is 20 euros to take the train, go to Milan and look for a concert ticket more 'or less € 50, then return home, another 20 €. Also if they are housed by her sister. And then the concert will be too many people, and I mean when I say too much dogs and pigs.
Radiohead are one of those bands that everyone likes because of the balance between high quality and catchiness. And then there are the guitars. Everybody loves SODDING guitars.
Sunday, June 15, 2008
I Saw My Father Masterbate
nothing nostalgic about the money I'm here to
These days I am following the Biografilm in Bologna, are accredited and this allows me to see two or three films a day without pay. The films I've seen these days are for the most part on the world revolves around Warhol's factory, the new york 60.70 years, drugs, people who went underground environments. I was not always satisfied with the quality of the documentaries, often constructed on the basis of anecdotal tales of misfits known or unknown at that time spent their time getting high - then even the memories are short and distorted, and glittering with reflected light from Warhol. Without him (that is, as happens most years' later) they will all die, and those alive will live in a degrading, unable to fend for themselves.
stories are often idealized, not at all critical and nostalgic. Leaving aside for a moment the speech Factory, I was pleasantly surprised by the documentary filmed between 67-68 from peter whitehead "the fall" that shows images of American society of those years with all its problems and contradictions, the struggle for civil rights to those against objections to the war in vietnam group of students.
I wonder what I would do in a situation prolific, almost like a tabula rasa where the common desire is to change the established order, the arts generations together, pop, punk and beat. What would happen?
Then I tell myself that I do not really matter so much, that I care about the future 'that the past and the past I need to understand precisely what will happen or what happens. I do not like nostalgia. 
These days I am following the Biografilm in Bologna, are accredited and this allows me to see two or three films a day without pay. The films I've seen these days are for the most part on the world revolves around Warhol's factory, the new york 60.70 years, drugs, people who went underground environments. I was not always satisfied with the quality of the documentaries, often constructed on the basis of anecdotal tales of misfits known or unknown at that time spent their time getting high - then even the memories are short and distorted, and glittering with reflected light from Warhol. Without him (that is, as happens most years' later) they will all die, and those alive will live in a degrading, unable to fend for themselves.
stories are often idealized, not at all critical and nostalgic. Leaving aside for a moment the speech Factory, I was pleasantly surprised by the documentary filmed between 67-68 from peter whitehead "the fall" that shows images of American society of those years with all its problems and contradictions, the struggle for civil rights to those against objections to the war in vietnam group of students.
I wonder what I would do in a situation prolific, almost like a tabula rasa where the common desire is to change the established order, the arts generations together, pop, punk and beat. What would happen?
Then I tell myself that I do not really matter so much, that I care about the future 'that the past and the past I need to understand precisely what will happen or what happens. I do not like nostalgia.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Prickly Heat Sensation On The Back
STATE HARASSMENT?
When the secular state becomes a sterile discourse detached from reality the stratum results are not obtained at all.
last night I participated more or less passively in a conference on secularism organized in view of gaypride 2008. The title was illuminating: "the place of churches" as a subtitle the role of religion in the public sphere.
I expected intellectuals were promised in the program including an Islamist and sociologist Khaled Fouad Allam, a mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi and instead occurred only a Waldensian theologian (Maria Bonafede), a cartoonist (Sergio Staino) and a philosopher (Paul Flores D 'Arcais). So the intellectual side of the speech was already being jeopardized by a small representation of the category. Never mind I thought that by now I was there and could still be interesting, so I decide to stay.
Without detracting from the sympathy of Sergio Staino (even my concierge is nice but does not start to do conferences on secularism), which opened the speech with a series of anecdotes-for even more fun - on his life by tracing a path - enough off topic in some ways-on his family relationships and business over the years. Nothing more 'boring for me that I have a cult for the personal cartoonist, then the show "all about Sergio Staino" was not a conference where I wanted to participate.
The alleged affinity between his native region, the Tuscan-secularism and I was not convinced a lot, so as the speech was lame on the cartoons, one could say much more 'in light of current events on the irreverent cartoon anti-Islamic "and the political manipulation to which it is, is a part - that of the muezzin, both from 'the other one of the "secular libertarians."
the cartoons
The speech is then much more 'interesting when you consider the context of these cartoons, their authors (all very different, some cartoons are indeed valid and belong to that system of power that the culture of derision, to ensure that Others are tools for political propaganda of the right closed and suffocating). It can not therefore speak only appropriate staff and cartoons that are made in Italy Pope's speech on why this is not just about Italy, indeed increasingly about 'all EU member states, and in any case not just about the Catholic religion.
What has puzzled me most was the title, this "place of churches in the public sphere" is interesting to analyze. First of all because there are not only asked alas, there are mosques, synagogues there, there are Buddhist temples, and churches still in Italy refers to one or Catholic, but there are Protestant churches, the Waldensian and so on .. And what is this place? And 'more' right to speak rather more 'people, those who have taken in the public sphere precisely ubiquitous in any political debate, thanks to the connivance with a political system that has the same representatives for 30 years, and all other religions, they also want their "right" a slice of this distribution of power among the various compositions and servility confessional state.
So we can no longer 'give all the blame to the Catholic Church, also because our social strata has changed in recent years and is designed to deep changes, we can no longer' white man talking about a Catholic but increasingly open the multi-ethnic and all those people who come in migration flows from places with often totalitarian political systems and religious (theocracies like Iran or Saudi Arabia) or where individual freedoms are just met. E 'recent news that the ban on female circumcision in Egypt.
So we said not a single church, but we also see that "... the role in the public sphere" as it is unthinkable to think only in the public sphere and not in private, is a fraud a fraud because the boundaries are blurred. The great paradox of liberal democracy is to retreat in the face of issues of individual freedom, however, legislating, and then actually taking action, even if to leave room for the person to click on.
When I asked the philosopher Paolo Flores d'Arcais "what is the limit on the secular sphere of individual liberties, "he told me he did not understand the question to be asked why he was not wearing a costume, a" uniform "(something like a veil, crosses, etc) is at odds with the secular culture that has react to prevent that from happening with a force equal or greater. So this Aout Aout or against the veil or not convinced me at all. First of Islam (if we talk about Islam, but we can easily do the speech with any religion) there are different, is not a monolith, moderate is not fundamentalist. Why then I ask myself the question of whether the veil to the French student I have to remove it or not, because as far as I can or can not bother, as is (in the European context today) a symbol of unholy departure from my values, I can not interfere with his liberty.
If the public sphere I have no doubt leave the places of all religious elements from the private to lay my conscience stops. In the same way that laws are made without taking into account the existence of God (in a secularism that is not Italy) religious symbols must remain in place for a ball that individual and personal, intimate as religion. (I remember the dramatic conversion of Magdi Allam of consciousness on live TV directly from Pope Benedict XVI)
But the problem remains. E 'right to prevent a person from wearing his religious status symbol? Not I should indeed make it possible that if you choose to wear them or not, but made her decide whether to prefer one religion to secular values? Why D'Arcais says "there is only secularism, there are many, and you can not talk about it as if it were a substitute for God because it is not" and then I replied "the problem did not arise when people had only a chain with the cross but there is now with other religions. " And then? The battle is not over 'between Catholics and non Catholics, but between religion vs. secularism? Reminiscent of those who does not look much different between Catholics and Muslims. Or one side or the other, and returns fire with fire.
what is sin is not a crime and then click
to be among the secularists or against them. Too bad it does not exist between Western values \u200b\u200bonly the distinction between church and state. And 'let us not forget the many battles for civil and political rights.
My conscience I an atheist, secular, if I see one of my fellow university with a cross, or should I dress like a monaco Buddhist saying, "toglitela!" I never will. Of course quell'esibizione bother me because it means that religious symbols are against everything that I advocate: abortion, stem cell research, the sexual freedom of thought, speech, study (see creationism American ad'esempio) Association, euthanasia, civil unions and so on .. and always wear their skin on their sacred right to disagree with me. It would be hypocritical of me to pretend that I do not care, that does not touch me, who are outside. It annoys me - I admit it-if I see the nuns, or people who exhibit their faith because a secular society, even if the believer could do without the need to sponsor public. Conceive and accept religious freedom when he is detached, when it advertised publicly exposing my critique secular, and I can only tolerate it but not accept it. Because for me it will always be something negative. 
When the secular state becomes a sterile discourse detached from reality the stratum results are not obtained at all.
last night I participated more or less passively in a conference on secularism organized in view of gaypride 2008. The title was illuminating: "the place of churches" as a subtitle the role of religion in the public sphere.
I expected intellectuals were promised in the program including an Islamist and sociologist Khaled Fouad Allam, a mathematician Piergiorgio Odifreddi and instead occurred only a Waldensian theologian (Maria Bonafede), a cartoonist (Sergio Staino) and a philosopher (Paul Flores D 'Arcais). So the intellectual side of the speech was already being jeopardized by a small representation of the category. Never mind I thought that by now I was there and could still be interesting, so I decide to stay.
Without detracting from the sympathy of Sergio Staino (even my concierge is nice but does not start to do conferences on secularism), which opened the speech with a series of anecdotes-for even more fun - on his life by tracing a path - enough off topic in some ways-on his family relationships and business over the years. Nothing more 'boring for me that I have a cult for the personal cartoonist, then the show "all about Sergio Staino" was not a conference where I wanted to participate.
The alleged affinity between his native region, the Tuscan-secularism and I was not convinced a lot, so as the speech was lame on the cartoons, one could say much more 'in light of current events on the irreverent cartoon anti-Islamic "and the political manipulation to which it is, is a part - that of the muezzin, both from 'the other one of the "secular libertarians."
the cartoons
The speech is then much more 'interesting when you consider the context of these cartoons, their authors (all very different, some cartoons are indeed valid and belong to that system of power that the culture of derision, to ensure that Others are tools for political propaganda of the right closed and suffocating). It can not therefore speak only appropriate staff and cartoons that are made in Italy Pope's speech on why this is not just about Italy, indeed increasingly about 'all EU member states, and in any case not just about the Catholic religion.
What has puzzled me most was the title, this "place of churches in the public sphere" is interesting to analyze. First of all because there are not only asked alas, there are mosques, synagogues there, there are Buddhist temples, and churches still in Italy refers to one or Catholic, but there are Protestant churches, the Waldensian and so on .. And what is this place? And 'more' right to speak rather more 'people, those who have taken in the public sphere precisely ubiquitous in any political debate, thanks to the connivance with a political system that has the same representatives for 30 years, and all other religions, they also want their "right" a slice of this distribution of power among the various compositions and servility confessional state.
So we can no longer 'give all the blame to the Catholic Church, also because our social strata has changed in recent years and is designed to deep changes, we can no longer' white man talking about a Catholic but increasingly open the multi-ethnic and all those people who come in migration flows from places with often totalitarian political systems and religious (theocracies like Iran or Saudi Arabia) or where individual freedoms are just met. E 'recent news that the ban on female circumcision in Egypt.
So we said not a single church, but we also see that "... the role in the public sphere" as it is unthinkable to think only in the public sphere and not in private, is a fraud a fraud because the boundaries are blurred. The great paradox of liberal democracy is to retreat in the face of issues of individual freedom, however, legislating, and then actually taking action, even if to leave room for the person to click on.
When I asked the philosopher Paolo Flores d'Arcais "what is the limit on the secular sphere of individual liberties, "he told me he did not understand the question to be asked why he was not wearing a costume, a" uniform "(something like a veil, crosses, etc) is at odds with the secular culture that has react to prevent that from happening with a force equal or greater. So this Aout Aout or against the veil or not convinced me at all. First of Islam (if we talk about Islam, but we can easily do the speech with any religion) there are different, is not a monolith, moderate is not fundamentalist. Why then I ask myself the question of whether the veil to the French student I have to remove it or not, because as far as I can or can not bother, as is (in the European context today) a symbol of unholy departure from my values, I can not interfere with his liberty.
If the public sphere I have no doubt leave the places of all religious elements from the private to lay my conscience stops. In the same way that laws are made without taking into account the existence of God (in a secularism that is not Italy) religious symbols must remain in place for a ball that individual and personal, intimate as religion. (I remember the dramatic conversion of Magdi Allam of consciousness on live TV directly from Pope Benedict XVI)
But the problem remains. E 'right to prevent a person from wearing his religious status symbol? Not I should indeed make it possible that if you choose to wear them or not, but made her decide whether to prefer one religion to secular values? Why D'Arcais says "there is only secularism, there are many, and you can not talk about it as if it were a substitute for God because it is not" and then I replied "the problem did not arise when people had only a chain with the cross but there is now with other religions. " And then? The battle is not over 'between Catholics and non Catholics, but between religion vs. secularism? Reminiscent of those who does not look much different between Catholics and Muslims. Or one side or the other, and returns fire with fire.
what is sin is not a crime and then click
to be among the secularists or against them. Too bad it does not exist between Western values \u200b\u200bonly the distinction between church and state. And 'let us not forget the many battles for civil and political rights.
My conscience I an atheist, secular, if I see one of my fellow university with a cross, or should I dress like a monaco Buddhist saying, "toglitela!" I never will. Of course quell'esibizione bother me because it means that religious symbols are against everything that I advocate: abortion, stem cell research, the sexual freedom of thought, speech, study (see creationism American ad'esempio) Association, euthanasia, civil unions and so on .. and always wear their skin on their sacred right to disagree with me. It would be hypocritical of me to pretend that I do not care, that does not touch me, who are outside. It annoys me - I admit it-if I see the nuns, or people who exhibit their faith because a secular society, even if the believer could do without the need to sponsor public. Conceive and accept religious freedom when he is detached, when it advertised publicly exposing my critique secular, and I can only tolerate it but not accept it. Because for me it will always be something negative.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)